key sniffer / sender [Archive] - ShowEQ Open Source Project Message Forums

eqhtw

11-04-2002, 01:50 PM

Damn Installshield, it should have caught that. :-)

I uploaded an update, so borlndmm.dll is included now, very sorry, is hard to second guess installshield when I'm installing/testing on the development machine (where all the dll's are already installed).

If you have a slow connection, you can just grab the dll from the same directory on the tripod site, instead of getting the whole thing again.

As far as tripod... aye, it sux, but I don't want to host it on my own server (yes, I'm a paranoid bastard like that, been playing EQ for heading on 4 years, but I still like it LOL).

HTW

nvmy383z28

11-04-2002, 01:51 PM

doh!

Temporarily Unavailable

The Tripod page you are trying to reach has exceeded its hourly bandwidth limit. The site will be available again in 2 hours!

Thank you!

eqhtw

11-04-2002, 02:04 PM

Alright, screw tripod, gimme a couple minutes....

eqhtw

11-04-2002, 02:31 PM

...

deadbane

11-04-2002, 02:35 PM

Hehe I love alpha testing.

Error: cc3250mt.dll Not found.

eqhtw

11-04-2002, 02:43 PM

..,

nvmy383z28

11-04-2002, 02:47 PM

can you post the source so that I can not feel so uneasy about using it :D Id love to use it - dont get me wrong - but I am sure you can understand :cool:

nvmy383z28

11-04-2002, 02:48 PM

cc3250mt.dll

You might wanna install this on a box other then your dev one ;)

Just a suggestion.

edit: nevermind ;)

Any chance of making this work so we dont have to use EQWindows?

More edit:

Is the ftp function of this automatic? When the key is grabbed - does it fire ftp? or?

Cant wait to try it though!

deadbane

11-04-2002, 02:49 PM

Awesome....works now. Great work with it...just what I was looking for.

Will test it tonight.

eqtryin

11-04-2002, 02:52 PM

Looks very nice, but this is the part im stuck at.

Very easy to modify showeq to either accept the key via udp (udp is simple),

what needs to be done?

eqhtw

11-04-2002, 03:05 PM

...

nvmy383z28

11-04-2002, 03:20 PM

sorry to be a pain in your side.... but:

Any chance to make this thing executable/usable/closeable via telnet? The reason I ask is:

Dont have to use EQWin to close it
It wont be always running

Zone in, run it, get key, quit. This way the "goods" are only running for a short time.

Just a shot in the dark. BUt AWESOME work so far. And I wouldnt worry about posting your code - I myself cant program for $#^%$ - but most likely others might just take it and build upon a good thing - to make it that much better.....

Keep up the good work.

P.S. any chance to impliment scp? (using the putty scp program/download) This would just seem a bit more "Secure" to me. Just a thought though.

Liluber

11-04-2002, 03:29 PM

Nice program. However I am not running EQW. There for I cannot run this. I would be interested in a command line program. E.g. Telnet to my EQ box and run it. Nor am I a programmer by any means but I would want to see the code before I run anything. After all this is open source.

I also want to thank the SEQ developers. What I have learned about the *nix world has opened my eyes to new Planes of knowledge. (No pun intended) I have gained much and lost a lot of sleep. =) I am now a preacher of the ways of our lord RTFM! And the Prophet SEARCH BUTTON.

eqhtw

11-04-2002, 04:41 PM

...

fryfrog

11-04-2002, 04:57 PM

you still haven't actually said yes/no to the posting of the source code. i know you think that your coding might be... not the best, but i feel that no one should use this unless we can see the source and compile it ourselves.

if not, how do we know that...

1.) you aren't actually from vi/sony and it isn't sending a packet or email to vi/sony. of course, we could monitor with tcpdump or firewall or something, but who wants to do that.
2.) you aren't sniffing passwords for eq off our network (or the single computer)
3.) it is a working key sniffer AND a nice little ddos tool
4.) it makes a random picture of you having sex with a random animal and sends it to everyone in your family (after sending it to the fbi and all the news papers).

anyway, while trust is generally a good thing... verification by your peers is better. i say, release the source to you, or if not then please i would ask that no one run this or at least realize that you could be running anything (even if it does work).

kaos057

11-04-2002, 05:14 PM

Ok what am i missing here? I want to use it without EQW. I have another windows PC besides my EQ PC so is there a way to make the keyfile update by itself and retrieve the file off the network on other PC?

kaos057

11-04-2002, 05:25 PM

ok nm it is working but when i open the file in notepad its some sort of code. How do i translate this to manualy enter it into seq?

FuddRucker

11-04-2002, 05:40 PM

Read some of the other posts, you'll figure it out...

...start here. (http://seq.sourceforge.net/showthread.php?s=&threadid=2260) If that doesn't help you, well... try searching (http://seq.sourceforge.net/search.php?s=).

--add--
Might all take Fryfrog's suggestion and not use this program until someone coughs up the source code for it. Read the posts just above yours.

kaos057

11-04-2002, 05:49 PM

I hate people that tell me to search just because they dont know what im talking about. This is a new program so there isnt going to be info on it from previous posts. The keyfile.bat is showing a code such as ›ªCÖDií please inform me on how to translate this to the numbers i need to enter. If you dont know please dont tell me to search. Maybe you can search for yourself and then post about how you dont know either.

who_me_use_seq

11-04-2002, 05:59 PM

No. Really. Just scroll up a ways. Just read this thread. It will come to you.

edit----

Just for the record I agree with the other participants here. I wouldn't run this until I got a chance to compile it myself.

MisterSpock

11-04-2002, 06:34 PM

Not to offend anyone, but I agree -- until souce code is forthcoming, I would not recommend running any binaries (.exe etc) that appear on here.

Just like SEQ itself, which is a U-Compile-It application (thus, you can look at all the source before you run it), I believe these little "helper" applications should be handled the same way.

Elyon

11-04-2002, 06:49 PM

I would agree with FryFrog too, particularly when eqhtw just registered THIS Month. C'Mon dude, just post the source, what's the big deal?

Just my opinion.....

Hedge

11-04-2002, 07:11 PM

I know this might be a lot to ask but you never know until you ask. For those of us that are not C programmers looking at the source code does us little good. Would it be possible to start a new area of the forums for exe files that have been approved by you C programmer like Ratt etc. ? So we could check those approved programs out and choose which we like the best?

fryfrog

11-04-2002, 07:33 PM

the devs have already said they will not support the key sniffer programs.

my suggestion would be to NOT bother with decode for a month or two. see what happens. i don't plan on using it until a few guinea (sp?) pigs have been using it without getting banned. i HAVE been downloading and compiling the ones available as source, but i won't be running them with eq at the same time for quite a while. at that point, i will probably try to customize which ever one i choose so that any "fingerprint" is not the same as what everyone else is using.

so, my suggestion would be to not run ANY of them... i would rather not lose any of my 4 accounts. GPS is fine with me.

darkangelx

11-04-2002, 11:53 PM

odd... still no source. Plenty of requests, yet those requests are ignored. *****ENTER RED FLAG HERE*****

Ratt has asked, if you read the first post, to supply source and not post binaries without source for those that can, look over it.

http://seq.sourceforge.net/showthread.php?s=&threadid=2333

Ramirez

11-05-2002, 04:17 AM

Not wanting to jump the bandwagon, but...

NO SOURCE YET - please moderators remove those links.

darkangelx

11-05-2002, 05:14 AM

Removed, gone private. Feel better now? :-)

No its the fact that after NUMEROUS requests for the source you decline to even respond. Feel better that you removed it because you are being secretive? thus untrustworthy? hell yes. Keep your Vi created exe or account stealer to yourself because you can bet anyone with a clue would see right through you and not have downloaded it(like myself)

No one said dont post your work, but show it to us in source so we can trust you mr 7 posts ever in these forums. Being an ass saying "gone private" etc just shows again you are hiding something. Anyone that downloaded that should highly consider deleting it.

eqhtw

11-05-2002, 05:44 AM

Not gonna argue with you dark, I've been around this shit for years, back on hackersquest. The fact I never posted here, and made an account to anonymize myself, is just that.

So, I had gone to sleep yesterday, woke up this morning to gather and post a source zip. Heh, nevermind, I'll just go play EQ. You can always tell the "users" on this board, by the way they post, with total lack of any common courtesy.

Maybe I'll come back by here in another year, and see how many insults you wanted to throw my way. In the mean time, go ahead and amuse yourselves with such a positive expenditure of energy.

Anyone need any help, email me. If you're not one of the common pricks from old HQ, or here, I might even reply.

HTW

Ramirez

11-05-2002, 06:01 AM

The rule is: "Post the source code".

Adapt or delete this entire post.

Nothing personal at all. No matter how good your input is: if you can not adapt to the rules then I would prefer not having it.

darkangelx

11-05-2002, 06:13 AM

So, I had gone to sleep yesterday, woke up this morning to gather and post a source zip. Heh, nevermind, I'll just go play EQ.

I guess we will never know your true intentions. However I see many people posting code. You know how to copy and paste TEXT right? I mean if you did write it I wouldn't think it beyond the your scope of skills to manage that unless you did not even have the source and got it from a GM buddy that told you to "post this " or your hacker friend that said "hey lets steal some accounts, use this"

You can always tell the "users" on this board, by the way they post, with total lack of any common courtesy.

Talking down to anyone here that is trying to get help or even worse trying to help others is just plain ignorant. It would also be seen as common courtesy to post the source code when you read what Ratt requested. You ignored his request and chose to do things your own way and now you are upset at the response you get?

Gullork

11-05-2002, 01:03 PM

And lastly, everyone needs to change the source some before compiling so that there doesn't end up being 200 users with the same 'finger/footprint'. Just downloading an exe and running it, even if there is no hidden account stealers or gm tips, is just as dangerous because then the number of users using the exact same code goes up.

Don't go away, post the code. Your ideas might help in the development of other sniffers and maybe help yours evolve a bit more. If nothing else, people here might help you clean it up a bit, since you think it is so messy.

fryfrog

11-05-2002, 02:02 PM

i think it would be great if you posted your source, the more (semi) safe keysniffers around the less likely others will be caught. if you want to post your source, please ignore any percieved offense taken by those requesting the source before trusting you.

if you don't, please just go ahead and remove the whole thread. this forum is for keysniffers with source and keysniffer discussion. why make a thread with no keysniffer and only some arguments for not posting it and the source. i believe you should be able to delete the whole thread, if not perhaps a mod will ;)