PDA

View Full Version : 05.12.02 Offset Same as 04.12.02


speedphreak
12-05-2002, 05:15 AM
offset is unchanged

eqgame.exe MD5: 407C65C30FA4E1791D8FBEBB8422D5F3

http://seq.sourceforge.net/showthread.php?s=&threadid=2561
landru
12-05-2002, 01:54 PM
I have tested it with the offset 0x0078bcb8 and it's not working. Have been looking for the new one, but haven't found it yet. But then again I'm still new at this.

Landru
landru
12-05-2002, 02:44 PM
I had my batch file wrong, sorry. Speedphreak is correct in all his divine wisdom.
Coet
12-05-2002, 05:55 PM
what-do you just size up the list of exports and count?
or how do you know? because if my guess is correct then in that case you could execute any of the functions exported to say auto-login for you after a link death while you were away in trader mode right?
Mr. Suspicious
12-05-2002, 08:29 PM
Coet, see that link on top of this page that sais: "Search"?

USE IT

In this forum's you'll even able to find a program that finds the offset for you. Compile it, run it: voila. Or better yet, look how it works, include it in your sniffer and * gasp * you'll never have to ask for the offset again.
LordCrush
12-06-2002, 12:40 AM
* gasp * nice idea :D

new point on todo list :p
speedphreak
12-06-2002, 03:10 AM
Not sure I have divine widsom! just like to do my bit to help ;)

As for the offset finding code, and its possible inclusion into the sniffer...

I don't use the program, I use a disassembler to view the location and check for extra code that might be tripwires etc.
I always find automated methods for this kind of stuff a little dangerous - the offset finder simply looks for a 6-byte signature and it would be very easy for VI to fool it to make the sniffer trigger a trap, or for it simply not to work if the signature changed.
Kudos to the author, I wouldn't like to detract from his efforts - but just be careful how much you rely on it.
Coet
12-12-2002, 04:01 PM
Mr Suspicious-
Perhaps your sarcasm would be more appreciated if you were addressing what I was leading to with my initial question- try reading the entire message before you comment next time.
who_me_use_seq
12-13-2002, 07:48 AM
No Coet, his flame was right on target. You are stupid and need to learn how to read. You are lucky that it was Mr Suspicious and not Jeeves that got to you first. Mr Suspicious was gentle with you.

To search, or not to search,--that is the question:--
Whether 'tis nobler in the mind to suffer
The slings and arrows of outrageous flaming
Or to take a look at the search function,
And by using it, end them?