-
Re: Decembers patch
Since I havent updated the SVN, only my local machine, I think any patch should be built off the existing SVN. Meaning add in the struct changes plus any op code changes.
I did not know there was another patch today. I would rather go fresh as if the patch on Thurs didn't happen.
-
Re: Decembers patch
.. I forgot to mention - I was using SB6141 (4x4 docsis 3.0) 6 months ago with 100/10, I was getting advertised speed. I retired it cuz Spectrum gave me a free 24x8 3.1 modem. And funny enough it gave me about 10ms less ping to EQ server. I could get 400/25 for $25 more month or 940/35 for $40 more a month but... 100/10 is plenty fast and I feel i'd be wasting more money.
-
1 Attachment(s)
Re: Decembers patch
it's deja vu all over again...
-
1 Attachment(s)
Re: Decembers patch
Here are some additional opcodes. This patch applies on top of Newby's patch above. (apply his first, then this one).
I've updated the beta branch to include both patches.
-
Re: Decembers patch
I can confirm the patches work, Thanks Newby and cn187. downloaded SVN, applied Newby patch, then cn187 patch, build and make.
-
Re: Decembers patch
Perfect.. thanks newby and cn187!
-
Re: Decembers patch
Hi everyone, where can i find documentation or something on how you guys make the patch updates etc?
-
Re: Decembers patch
You may want to read the man page, but generally it will be "patch -pN < patchfile" where N is the number of directories to strip from the paths in the patchfile. Also "--dryrun" will do a test application of the patch without modifying anything, to tell you if your starting directory and P-value are correct, and if the patch will apply cleanly.