Another note,
To the best of my knowledge, SOE still only sends XP updates when it creates movement on your XP bar. So, once the XP window is "working", you'll see 0 experience for several...
Type: Posts; User: Lyroschen
Another note,
To the best of my knowledge, SOE still only sends XP updates when it creates movement on your XP bar. So, once the XP window is "working", you'll see 0 experience for several...
http://www.hackersquest.org/boards/viewforum.php?f=2&sid=c444141f9c5f047ff46757bd125bf2a8
Aye, there are a couple ways to test to see if you can see packets on the wire, in general. I've noticed that several (especially Linksys) hubs will do some level of switching, even though it's not...
To the best of my knowledge, EQEmu doesn't work with the latest zones, although my info may be outdated.
Hard way is to turn on logging, then do a /loc at each point you want a put a line point. Don't know if there are any proggies out there to parse a log of locs to create a map file. If not, you...
Seems to me you don't object to the RTFM response, but instead object to those who object to it. \\=^ )
LibEQ.a has been closed source for a long time, under the premise of discouraging Windows versions of SEQ. As Ratt mentioned a while ago, that premise is moot these days, so he has offered the...
I honestly believe that most of the folks who object to RTFM and Search responses do so because they get lost when trying to RTFM or Search. There is a level of awareness that seperates the...
/agree
Hmm, moved fester's post to a different thread?
Glad to know it's working. Based on what you had posted earlier, my guess is that you copied the wrong offsets. But, it's working now, and that's what matters.
Might be time for some basics, BA.
The current client zip file already has the maps in it. The current server zip file has the correct offset ini. Download each of these to the respective...
Might be worth adding an error trap for missing maps.
Here's a packet sniffing for beginners article.
http://www.zdnet.com/products/stories/reviews/0,4161,2632004,00.html
I always saw the flames as a way to discourage novice folks from coming here at all. Ratt has mentioned many times that he doesn't want anyone to use SEQ. The less popular, the better... or...
Hiyas! Glad to see you're still around. \\=^ )
My hope is for the "flame-free" forum to be non-newbie issues. N00b questions would get moved out of the forum, as would other inappropriate posts. The ones remaining would be (in theory)...
I like the idea of a "trash" free forum. Hopefully, without all the junk posts, the devs will actually be willing to give more information.
I agree the Dev forum would be the best of the existing...
Sorry, Casey, I linked that thread when they started up a new thread about flaming vs not flaming. Didn't expect someone to bump it.
http://seq.sourceforge.net/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=2893
It appears that mob position updates are based on proximity, now, so folks won't see mob position updates unless they are somewhat near them. If this is true, it may hamper the effectiveness of such...
This might sound silly, but do you have the maps folder in the client folder?
LOL, kinda funny you picked me out of this whole thing to attack, BL. ::shrug:: Maybe my typo made me your only real target. Doesn't matter, you're probably still lashing out from the embarassment...
Lying shouldn't make you feel better about yourself.
Agreed, not a smart way of setting up a poll. It's possible that this is his way of dealing with such a horrible incident. It's a hallmark...
Thanks for moving this to RRRRRR.
LOL, I think Jeeves is cool. Don't always agree with him, and am not as quick to flame. But, I appreciate the comparison.
Normally I wouldn't have bothered posting to you, but I was curious...