Sony has won

[third_party]

So, despite all the protestations that the seq developers are superior, it seems that Sony has won. ShowEQ is dead and beaten.

There are two alternatives at this point:
1) The current sony code is too hard for the showeq developers to figure out, and have given up.
2) The current sony code has been figured out, but none of the seq developers wants to release it and announce that they've done it, in fear that Sony will just change it again and break them.

So, if its alternative 2, and they've got it all figured out, they (the inner circle of showeq developers) have got showeq working for themselves, and they're going to keep it, just for themselves. Regardless of whether they're hoarding it or not, the result is the same, Sony has won, and all of you dont have it.

[Grae1]

Tad bitchy aren't we?

Yeah, I wish SEQ was up and runnin, but really.. It seems like its a major pain this time around to get it working..


so.. since the devs here do this for FREE. And let you use it for FREE, why ya bitchin?

[Dedpoet]

I see many flames in your future.

ShowEQ is not dead. The developers have most everything figured out and are just waiting on the network code to stabilize before putting out a fix. It's not dead and beaten, it's just resting.

[a_necro00]

yes dude, SOE won, please stop trying to use SEQ, telling anyone that SEQ exists and most important, stop visiting this forums.

[uncleubb]

RRRRRR

-uu

[Hendrix_Morton]

It's people like you what cause unrest...

Chill....When its ready, its ready....bitch'n and moan'n aint gonna make it happen sooner...there are some very intelligent devs workin on this, and they will release it when they think its done...Not to hush up whiners like you.

>HM<

[mantra71]

I think this post as most others are just a futile attempt to get some official comment from the SEQ developers.

It's almost impossible to ask a question in any of the forums except the map one, which is still civil. Even the IRC channel has in topic, ask about the project and get banned.

I personally come visit this page atleast once per day and the question I have before I even loaded the page is: Is showeq fixed.

What the forum really lacks now is some 'proof of life' from the developer side, and also quality discussion about functionality.

I don't bother post questions anymore cause someone is just going to be a dick about it.

[Velium_hound]

Heh, it's just a game, and last I checked, the purpose of a game is to have fun. If you can't have fun without SEQ, then stop playing and go back to farming chickens in Dungeon Seige.

[GregChant]

I promised myself I would just stick to my topic, but I just liked to say...

Dungeon Siege > *.

[GregChant]

And, as one of the IRC operators, the reason we have that in the topic is to prevent the hooligans who come in, ask "R SHOEWEDQ RIXED YET?!?!? HOW CMOE?!?! I WNAT SHEOQ!!! UR LAME!!!1"

Additionally, it says in the topic, "ShowEQ is broken."

Read the fscking topic. All of it.

/rant

[quackrabbit]

third_party
Posts: 1

Go Away troll.

[baelang]

Yep, you are correct. sony won. It is far too hard for us to figure out. oh well. time (for you) to switch to DAoC. or something.

[Dedpoet]

I promise this is the one and only time I will post about this topic:

I don't bother post questions anymore cause someone is just going to be a dick about it.

I don't understand why people continue to say this. This is only true about questions that have been covered before, not valid, well-written questions. I spent 5 minutes and came up with all of these threads that were in the help forum where a question was answered. All of these were in the first 2 pages of the 30-day active topic list.

http://seq.sourceforge.net/showthrea...&threadid=2847

http://seq.sourceforge.net/showthrea...&threadid=2830

http://seq.sourceforge.net/showthrea...&threadid=2823

http://seq.sourceforge.net/showthrea...&threadid=2824

http://seq.sourceforge.net/showthrea...&threadid=2811

http://seq.sourceforge.net/showthrea...&threadid=2807

http://seq.sourceforge.net/showthrea...&threadid=2801

People here are more than willing to help those who just take a few minutes and read 2 documents (INSTALL.newbies and the FAQ) and try a search first.

Ok, I promise never to post on this issue again.

[Raistlin]

Ah yes, I see fauder for Ratt's Redundantly Redundant Forum.

Move at will Ratt..

Lock and Load Ladies and Gentelmen.

[LordCrush]

Rdy

But until then think about ... sense nad nonsense of dooing adaptions on intermediate protocols :P