Just something to consider folks... You don't have to be a dick all the time.
By reading:
It would lead me to believe its working, alas it isn't though.The current md5sum of libEQ.a (28/Oct/02): ddaac48baaa3e9b015984a366748ed72
Use of any other libEQ.a is not recommended and could be a possible trojan.
The current memory offset is 0x007c1950 as of 28 Jan 03 (If there has been a patch since this date, it may not be accurate or updated yet)
Granite that is for dev folks I'm sure. But the dev folks are part of the "in crowd" they don't need to be told that most of the time. I think its a little misleading.
A simple Green light for good and red light for bad would suffice.
As to whether the current CVS / Libeq is working.
Unfortunately there is no IQ test to come onto this msg board. That seems to bother some of the folks, I bite into the "use the search button" on the forum I frequent as well. Upon coming here though, I think I will do that ALOT less. On the forum I frequent, is just that, I read it day in and day out, so for me to use the search forum would be easy because I've already read it and know what to search for. However coming here where I haven't read it all and don't know who's post to look for definative answers. Well it leaves too much to find.
The Forum I go to isn't much of a "technical" forum either, I wouldn't say the average IQ of where I frequent is near as high as it is here. Which in itself is a shame because you folks know that the nekkid and untrained eye can't see where the problem is. Just know that it is or isn't working. Much less know how to fix it.
To the ones that put up a fancy
http://seq.sourceforge.net/search.php?s= Search links and all these slap happy flames, a simple "not yet" or "yea, re-CVS and compile" would certainly suffice.