I downloaded the newest CVS and all installed good as far as I could tell.
When I run SEQ i get:
Client Detected: 192.168.1.5
Error: Expected 20647, but only 1805 left
Error: Expected 62414, but only 353 left
the error messages continue like that till i quit. Any suggestions?
What did you do after you got the new CVS update?
--------
- Catt
>SELECT * FROM users WHERE clue > 0;
0 rows returned
/em sigh
Typical update stuff
exported QT
make -f Makefile.dist && ./cofigure && make -j3 && make install
then started it up
Ok, I suck... apparently I didnt type cvs -z3 update
I now get an error compling... i am running qt 2.3.2, do i need to upgrade to 3.0?
Yes, the newest version want Qt 3.x.x
--------
- Catt
>SELECT * FROM users WHERE clue > 0;
0 rows returned
/em sigh
Looks like it's definitely time to get the FAQ updated to reflect the QT3 requirements. I won't be around tonight, as I will be watching Professional_Hockey_Team_01 lay waste to Professional_Hockey_Team_09, but I should get it updated tomorrow.
INSTALL.newbies file was already updated and submitted as patch quite some time ago, still hasn't made it into the latest CVS tho =/
Before asking anything read the pre-face section of http://www.smoothwall.org/download/p....9/doc.faq.pdf
after you've read it, you know what to do next...
"Stay alert! Trust noone! Keep your Lazers Handy! Have a nice day." -- Provided courtesy of the Computer. The Computer never lies.
SO is this a confirmed requirement now?
Up until the last black-out, I was running the latest SEQ using QT 2.x as my compiler.... I know it has been stated awhile back that QT3 was strongly suggested, but QT2 did still work..
Just looking for confirmation ... (though I will still be an stubborn idiot and try recompiling tonight using QT2 just for kicks)
still running qt 2.3.2 on mine as of last night.. works like a champ.. one day i will get around to installing RH8.. prolly the day they make 3.05 required period.. but 2.3.2 DOES still work..
This post still holds true:
http://seq.sourceforge.net/showthrea...&threadid=2685
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote